Extending UTAUT2 to Explain Artificial Intelligence Adoption Among University Students in Indonesian Islamic Higher Education: An Empirical SEM-PLS Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59373/kharisma.v5i2.142Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Islamic Higher Education, UTAUT2, Behavioral Intention, SEM-PLS, Technology AdoptionAbstract
Empirical evidence on AI adoption in Islamic higher education institutions within emerging economies remains limited, as prior studies have predominantly focused on universities in developed countries and have rarely examined the applicability of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT2) in this unique educational context. Addressing this gap, this study extends the UTAUT2 framework to examine the determinants of AI adoption among students at Islamic universities in Pekanbaru, Indonesia. A quantitative approach was employed using survey data collected from 200 students through probability sampling and analyzed with Structural Equation Modeling–Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS). The results reveal that Performance Expectancy, Facilitating Conditions, Hedonic Motivation, and Habit significantly influence Behavioral Intention, whereas Effort Expectancy, Social Influence, and Price Value do not. Furthermore, Behavioral Intention has a strong positive effect on Use Behavior. The structural model demonstrates substantial explanatory power, with an R² of 0.721 for Behavioral Intention and 0.428 for Use Behavior, indicating that the proposed model effectively explains students' AI adoption behavior. This study contributes theoretically by validating and extending UTAUT2 in the underexplored context of Islamic higher education in an emerging economy, highlighting the dominant roles of perceived usefulness, intrinsic motivation, and habitual technology use. Practically, the findings provide evidence-based guidance for university leaders and policymakers to develop AI-supported learning environments through improved digital infrastructure, student engagement strategies, and sustainable AI integration in higher education.
Downloads
References
Acosta-Enriquez, B. G., Farroñan, E. V. R., Zapata, L. I. V., Garcia, F. S. M., Rabanal-León, H. C., Angaspilco, J. E. M., & Bocanegra, J. C. S. (2024). Acceptance of artificial intelligence in university contexts: A conceptual analysis based on UTAUT2 theory. Heliyon, 10(19). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38315
Ali, M., Prawironegoro, A. H., Aulia, N. N., Siregar, J., Murniarti, E., Ghazali, A., & Fatmasari, R. (2026). Probability and Causality Models of QA Success in Indonesian Distance Learning. Munaddhomah: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 7(2), 539–554. https://doi.org/10.31538/munaddhomah.v7i2.2428
Alshammari, S. H., & Babu, E. (2025). The mediating role of satisfaction in the relationship between perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and students’ behavioural intention to use ChatGPT. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 7169. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-91634-4
Aprilianto, A., Majid, M. A. A., & Kartiko, A. (2025). Head Role School As Inner Motivator Improving Teacher Performance. Create: Journal of Islamic Management and Business, 1(1), 13–24.
Asnefi, A., Sakti, E. M. S., Dayanti, D., & Syarif, I. (2026). Design and Evaluation of an AI-Assisted Digital KPI Information System for Employee Performance Monitoring and Recommendation. Jurnal Testing Dan Implementasi Sistem Informasi, 4(1), 60–86. https://doi.org/10.55583/jtisi.v4i1.2342
Baker, M. J. (2003). Data Collection – Questionnaire Design. The Marketing Review, 3(3), 343–370. https://doi.org/10.1362/146934703322383507
Ballesteros, M. A. A., Enríquez, B. G. A., Farroñán, E. V. R., Juárez, H. D. G., Salinas, L. E. C., Sánchez, J. E. B., Castillo, J. C. A., Licapa-Redolfo, G. S., & Chilicaus, G. C. F. (2024a). The Sustainable Integration of AI in Higher Education: Analyzing ChatGPT Acceptance Factors Through an Extended UTAUT2 Framework in Peruvian Universities. Sustainability, 16(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310707
Boddy, C. R. (2016). Sample size for qualitative research. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 19(4), 426–432. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-06-2016-0053
Cabero-Almenara, J., Palacios-Rodríguez, A., Loaiza-Aguirre, M. I., & Andrade-Abarca, P. S. (2024). The impact of pedagogical beliefs on the adoption of generative AI in higher education: predictive model from UTAUT2. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7, 1497705. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1497705
Cabero-Almenara, J., Palacios-Rodríguez, A., Rojas Guzmán, H. D. L. Á., & Fernández-Scagliusi, V. (2025). Prediction of the use of generative artificial intelligence through ChatGPT among Costa Rican university students: A PLS model based on UTAUT2. Applied Sciences, 15(6), 3363. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15063363
Deng, R., Jiang, M., Yu, X., Lu, Y., & Liu, S. (2025). Does ChatGPT enhance student learning? A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies. Computers & Education, 227, 105224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105224
Graafsma, I. L., Marinus, E., Robidoux, S., Nickels, L., & Caruana, N. (2022). No evidence that autistic traits predict programming learning outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 7, 100215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100215
Granić, A., & Marangunić, N. (2019). Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2572–2593. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864
Grassini, S., Aasen, M. L., & Møgelvang, A. (2024). Understanding University Students’ Acceptance of ChatGPT: Insights from the UTAUT2 Model. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 38(1), 2371168. https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2024.2371168
Gustinov, M. D., Azani, N. W., Ghani, R. A., Auliani, S. N., Maharani, S., Hamzah, M. L., & Rizki, M. (2023). Analysis of Web-Based E-Commerce Testing Using Black Box and White Box Methods. International Journal of Information System and Innovation Management (IJISIM), 1(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.55583/ijisim.v1i1.687
Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). An introduction to structural equation modeling. In Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: a workbook (pp. 1-29). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7_1
Helmiatin, Hidayat, A., & Kahar, M. R. (2024). Investigating the adoption of AI in higher education: A study of public universities in Indonesia. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2380175. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2380175
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Hossan, D., Mansor, Z. D., & Jaharuddin, N. S. (2023). Research Population and Sampling in Quantitative Study. International Journal of Business and Technopreneurship (IJBT), 13(3), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.58915/ijbt.v13i3.263
Indasari, N. L. (2026). Modelling Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence Technology among Pre-service Teachers in Islamic Higher Education. At-Tadzkir: Islamic Education Journal, 5(1), 22–39. https://doi.org/10.59373/attadzkir.v5i1.241
Jannah, D. M., Huda, S., Yasin, M., Sanatang, S., Fakhri, M. M., Wahid, S. N., Kaswar, A. B., Soeharto, S., & Amukune, S. (2026). AI Literacy, Technical Skills, and Ethical Awareness in Predicting Students’ Learning Performance. Online Learning In Educational Research (OLER), 6(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.58524/oler.v6i1.565
Kamenov, H. (2025). Application of Artificial Intelligence in Teaching Bulgarian Literature. Jurnal Arbitrer, 12(4), 496–511. https://doi.org/10.25077/ar.12.4.496-511.2025
Kelly, S., Kaye, S.-A., & Oviedo-Trespalacios, O. (2023). What factors contribute to the acceptance of artificial intelligence? A systematic review. Telematics and Informatics, 77, 101925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2022.101925
Moniruzzaman Sarker, & AL-Muaalemi, M. A. (2022). Sampling Techniques for Quantitative Research. In M. R. Islam, N. A. Khan, & R. Baikady (Eds), Principles of Social Research Methodology (pp. 221–234). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5441-2_15
Mozie, N. M., Ghazali, N., & Husin, L. I. A. (2025). Adopting Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Insights from the UTAUT Framework on Students Intentions. Advances in Business Research International Journal, 11(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.24191/abrij.v11i1.8641
Murphy, L. (2023). The Questionnaire Surveying Research Method: Pros, Cons and Best Practices. ScienceOpen Preprints. https://doi.org/10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-.PP3WYS8.v1
Musa, M., Ismail, M. N., Tahir, S., Fudzee, M. F. M., & Jofri, M. H. (2022). Student Acceptance Towards Online Learning Management System based on UTAUT2 Model. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications (IJACSA), 13(11). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2022.0131115
Mutaqin, Z., Mardhiyah, L., Machmudah, U., Muassomah, M., & Hamid, M. F. B. A. (2026). Comparing AI-Assisted Digital Learning Media for Maharah al-Istima’:A Pedagogical Analysis of Spotify, Voicemaker, and Quizalize. Jurnal Nispatti, 11(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.26811/nispatti.v11i1.234
Purwati, A. A., Abdullah, S. I. N. W., & Deli, M. M. (2025). A qualitative synthesis of artificial intelligence adoption in msmes: insights into opportunities and challenges. Jurnal Testing Dan Implementasi Sistem Informasi, 3(2), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.55583/jtisi.v3i2.2328
Raffaghelli, J. E., Rodríguez, M. E., Guerrero-Roldán, A.-E., & Bañeres, D. (2022). Applying the UTAUT model to explain the students’ acceptance of an early warning system in Higher Education. Computers & Education, 182, 104468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104468
Romero-Rodríguez, J.-M., Ramírez-Montoya, M.-S., Buenestado-Fernández, M., & Lara-Lara, F. (2023). Use of ChatGPT at University as a Tool for Complex Thinking: Students’ Perceived Usefulness. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 12(2), 323–339. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2023.7.1458
Sabol, M., Hair, J., Cepeda, G., Roldán, J. L., & Chong, A. Y. L. (2023). PLS-SEM in information systems: Seizing the opportunity and marching ahead full speed to adopt methodological updates. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 123(12), 2997–3017. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-07-2023-0429
Sallam, M., Elsayed, W., Al-Shorbagy, M., Barakat, M., El Khatib, S., Ghach, W., Alwan, N., Hallit, S., & Malaeb, D. (2024). ChatGPT usage and attitudes are driven by perceptions of usefulness, ease of use, risks, and psycho-social impact: A study among university students in the UAE. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1414758
Sharma, S., & Singh, G. (2024). Adoption of artificial intelligence in higher education: An empirical study of the UTAUT model in Indian universities. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-024-02558-7
Supriyadi, T., Julia, J., Supriadi, U., Rahminawati, N., & Baxtiyorovna, A. S. (2025). DEEP-AI Pedagogical Model for Strengthening Al-Qur’an Interpretation Literacy in Islamic Religious Education. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 22(1), 275–294. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.v22i1.11053
Tian, W., Ge, J., Zhao, Y., & Zheng, X. (2024). AI Chatbots in Chinese higher education: Adoption, perception, and influence among graduate students—an integrated analysis utilizing UTAUT and ECM models. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1268549
Uren, V., & Edwards, J. S. (2023). Technology readiness and the organizational journey towards AI adoption: An empirical study. International Journal of Information Management, 68, 102588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102588
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157-178. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
Wijaya, R. F., & Putra, R. R. (2026). Adoption of Berastagi Verse in Mobile Metaverse Learning: Extending TAM With Immersion and Cultural Value. Journal of Applied Engineering and Technological Science (JAETS), 7(2), 1407–1422. https://doi.org/10.37385/jaets.v7i2.10584
Xue, L., Ghazali, N., & Mahat, J. (2026). A Systematic Review of UTAUT and UTAUT2 for AI Adoption in Education. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 42(8), 5666–5690. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2025.2552867
Yuan, R., Jalil, H. A., & Omar, M. K. (2025). From Engagement to Empowerment: AI-Powered Mobile Applications and the UTAUT Framework in Higher Education. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 14(1), 437–448. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v14-i1/24332
Yusiana, D. (2025). Analytical Study on the Application of Islamic Economic Law Principles at SPM Sharia Bank (Sarana Prima Mandiri), Pejagan–Bangkalan. Santara: Journal of Islamic Law and Humanity, 1(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.59373/santara.v1i1.129
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Luthfi Hamzah, M. Alpi Syahrin, Mei Triana, Astri Ayu Purwati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
